I was watching
an awards function and the channel has always been one of my favorites due to
its creativity and the way they package their programs. Their awards function
is becoming more and more popular which was pretty perceptible from the number
of sponsors that was read out. Awards functions are always with lots of glitz
and glamour and it attracts lots of celebrities naturally. Channel was very vigilant
is choosing jury members and they change the members every year just to make
sure the integrity is not questioned. Channel also does a good job in spotting
good talents and recognizing them in a big stage and hence persuade budding
talents and make the general public aware of such talents.
Because I like the
channel very much I am prompted to question them on what basis did they give
the coveted Chevalier Sivaji Ganesan award to SRK and not to some of the
legends in the state like MSV, Raja sir, Manorama achi, Janaki madam etc.,
There definitely got to be a protocol in choosing the recipient of this award;
Can the Channel publish that to public? Who decides the recipient? Does Glamour
and popularity play a role in choosing the recipient? Does Box office results
alone good enough? The Channel got to respect the intelligence of the audience
and should not test them.
The anchor is
stalwart on public stage and who can talk on any topic embarrassed many by
asking the audience to give a standing ovation to this north Indian figure. Why
does he want to hang his brains in front of a celebrity? He talks about so many
things about dignity and the way one should carry themselves by why all of a
sudden this change in attitude? Is this called Hypocrisy at his best?
Every time I see the cricket stadium full of people I wonder
how responsible the cricket officials should be. This entire spot fixing scandal
is taking the cricket frenzy nation for granted. Often double standards are
employed and the people are been taken for granted. Can these officials be
called as modern day hypocrites?
No comments:
Post a Comment